top of page

Duration Gap: Definition, Formula and Limitations

Duration Gap: Definition, Formula and Limitations

The duration gap is a key metric used in asset-liability management (ALM) to measure a financial institution’s exposure to changes in interest rates. It represents the difference between the duration of assets and the duration of liabilities, helping banks and investors understand how shifts in interest rates can affect their net worth or equity value.



What Is Duration Gap?

Duration measures how sensitive a bond or portfolio’s value is to changes in interest rates. When we apply this concept to a bank’s balance sheet, the duration gap reflects the mismatch between how quickly assets and liabilities respond to interest rate movements.


  • If a bank’s assets (like loans and securities) have a longer duration than its liabilities (like deposits), a rise in interest rates can reduce the value of its assets more than its liabilities eroding equity.

  • Conversely, if liabilities have a longer duration, a drop in rates can harm the bank’s value.


In essence, the duration gap provides a measure of interest rate risk and the potential impact of rate fluctuations on the institution’s capital position.



The Formula

The basic formula for the duration gap is:


Duration Gap = Duration of Assets – (Liabilities ÷ Assets × Duration of Liabilities)


A positive duration gap means assets are more sensitive to rate changes than liabilities (exposed to rising rates), while a negative duration gap implies greater sensitivity on the liability side (exposed to falling rates).



Why Duration Gap Matters


For banks, pension funds, and insurance companies, managing duration gap is crucial for maintaining financial stability. Even small interest rate changes can significantly alter the market value of portfolios with large mismatches.


A properly managed duration gap helps:

  • Protect net interest margins against volatility.

  • Maintain regulatory capital requirements.

  • Support strategic interest rate hedging decisions using derivatives like swaps or futures.


In a rising rate environment, institutions typically aim to shorten asset duration or lengthen liability duration to mitigate losses.



Example of Duration Gap in Action


Imagine a bank with an average asset duration of 5 years and a liability duration of 3 years. If its total assets equal its liabilities, the duration gap is:


Duration Gap = 5 – (1 × 3) = 2 years


This positive duration gap means the bank is exposed to interest rate increases. If rates rise, the value of assets will decline more than liabilities, reducing the bank’s equity. Conversely, if rates fall, the bank benefits as asset values rise more sharply than liabilities.



Managing Duration Gap

Financial institutions use several strategies to manage or minimize duration gap risk:


  • Interest Rate Swaps: To align asset and liability durations.

  • Hedging Portfolios: Using derivatives to offset exposure.

  • Balance Sheet Rebalancing: Adjusting loan and deposit maturities.

  • Securitization or Floating-Rate Instruments: To reduce duration mismatches.


Effective duration management is part of a broader Asset-Liability Management (ALM) framework designed to preserve capital and maintain profitability in volatile markets.



Limitations of Duration Gap Analysis

While the duration gap is a powerful indicator, it has limitations:


  • It assumes parallel shifts in the yield curve, which is rarely the case.

  • It relies on average durations, which may not capture non-linear price responses.

  • It ignores optionalities like prepayments or callable bonds that alter effective durations.


For this reason, banks often combine duration gap with simulation models and value-at-risk (VaR) methods to capture a fuller picture of interest rate exposure.



Conclusion


The duration gap is a vital tool for understanding and managing interest rate risk. By quantifying the sensitivity difference between assets and liabilities, it allows institutions to anticipate how market changes will affect their capital position.


A well-controlled duration gap ensures financial resilience, while poor management can expose firms to significant valuation losses. In today’s dynamic rate environment, continuous monitoring and adjustment are essential for long-term stability.

 
 

London Real Estate Institute

TM

bottom of page